Comments on: JC Animal Control on Arnold Diaz’s “Shame On You” Segment http://www.jcregister.com/2009/03/26/jc-animal-control-on-arnold-diazs-shame-on-you-segment.html Local Jersey City Information | Jersey City News & Events | Jersey City Online | NJ New Jersey Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: BENNY http://www.jcregister.com/2009/03/26/jc-animal-control-on-arnold-diazs-shame-on-you-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-3058 BENNY Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:03:16 +0000 http://www.jcregister.com/?p=1674#comment-3058 JOE FRANK SHOULD HAD BEEN FIRED YEARS AGO! THAT PART OF LINCOLN PARK IS CALLED CAT LAND. JOE KNOWS OF IT CAUSE HE WAS THE ONE THAT FIRST INTRODUCED THIS TO HIS JCY GOON WORKERS! FIRE HIM ALREADY! HE HAS FRIENDS AND FAMILY COLLECT REWARD MONEY ON LOST PETS! HE SHOULD BE INVESTAGATED! JOE FRANK SHOULD HAD BEEN FIRED YEARS AGO! THAT PART OF LINCOLN PARK IS CALLED CAT LAND. JOE KNOWS OF IT CAUSE HE WAS THE ONE THAT FIRST INTRODUCED THIS TO HIS JCY GOON WORKERS! FIRE HIM ALREADY! HE HAS FRIENDS AND FAMILY COLLECT REWARD MONEY ON LOST PETS! HE SHOULD BE INVESTAGATED!

]]> By: Laura Morgan http://www.jcregister.com/2009/03/26/jc-animal-control-on-arnold-diazs-shame-on-you-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-3040 Laura Morgan Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:52:08 +0000 http://www.jcregister.com/?p=1674#comment-3040 Dear Sir, My daughter recently received a puppy as a gift purchased from "The Breeders Network" Manalapan NJ. The puppy arrived 11/26/2010 with a certification from the sellers veterinarian "Certifiably fit for sale". This puppy was issued antibiotics and a de-wormer upon leaving the pet store. I called and questioned them as to why she needed to medications and was told that is "common practice". I accepted that answer that day. The puppy was not thriving as expected. I made an appointment with one of the vets  suggested by the puppy store, she was seen by the vet on 12/01/2010, the vet issued a "Veterinary Certificate of Unfitness". The puppy was coughing, choking on its sputum, sneezing and not doing well physically. The veterinarian suggested she be seen 2 days later if not feeling any better. She was then seen on 12/03/2010 and hospitalized in intensive care and isolation. Her diagnosis after testing was "Bronchiopneumonia, Leuckocytosis, Neutrophilia, Anemia and Fecal Positive for Coccidia". She was treated aggressively with anitobiotics etc. and released on 12/06/2010. The veterinarian called to check on the puppy on 12/07/2010 and stated her bloodwork showed she is still very sick and to continue with all the meds prescribed on discharge. How dare these people release a puppy on antibiotics and a de-wormer by a sales associate? Is this common practice to release a very sick animal that was $1100.00? Regardless of the price that was paid for her, is this appropriate? The  pet dealer is selling domestic "SICK" animals to the public. This is not acceptable. I have been in contact with the ASPCA of Monmouth County and this continues to be an open investigation. I want these places exposed. This is not right and now my other elderly dog has been exposed to a very contagious disease. Please help us to get justice for these poor animals.... I am willing to testify and provide all my paperwork. Sincerely, Laura Morgan 7 Snowchief Court Howell, NJ  07731 732-308-3573 Dear Sir,
My daughter recently received a puppy as a gift purchased from ”The Breeders Network” Manalapan NJ. The puppy arrived 11/26/2010 with a certification from the sellers veterinarian “Certifiably fit for sale”. This puppy was issued antibiotics and a de-wormer upon leaving the pet store. I called and questioned them as to why she needed to medications and was told that is “common practice”. I accepted that answer that day.
The puppy was not thriving as expected. I made an appointment with one of the vets  suggested by the puppy store, she was seen by the vet on 12/01/2010, the vet issued a “Veterinary Certificate of Unfitness”. The puppy was coughing, choking on its sputum, sneezing and not doing well physically. The veterinarian suggested she be seen 2 days later if not feeling any better. She was then seen on 12/03/2010 and hospitalized in intensive care and isolation. Her diagnosis after testing was “Bronchiopneumonia, Leuckocytosis, Neutrophilia, Anemia and Fecal Positive for Coccidia”. She was treated aggressively with anitobiotics etc. and released on 12/06/2010. The veterinarian called to check on the puppy on 12/07/2010 and stated her bloodwork showed she is still very sick and to continue with all the meds prescribed on discharge.
How dare these people release a puppy on antibiotics and a de-wormer by a sales associate? Is this common practice to release a very sick animal that was $1100.00? Regardless of the price that was paid for her, is this appropriate? The  pet dealer is selling domestic “SICK” animals to the public. This is not acceptable.
I have been in contact with the ASPCA of Monmouth County and this continues to be an open investigation.
I want these places exposed. This is not right and now my other elderly dog has been exposed to a very contagious disease.
Please help us to get justice for these poor animals…. I am willing to testify and provide all my paperwork.
Sincerely,
Laura Morgan
7 Snowchief Court
Howell, NJ  07731
732-308-3573

]]>